CA: The Financial Fallout Over Child Sexual Abuse Lawsuits in California

Source: nytimes.com 5/9/25

The law set off a wave of child sex abuse litigation that has pushed some public institutions to the brink of financial crisis. School districts face up to $3 billion in claims.

In 2018, an anonymous tip led the authorities in California to Eric Uller, who for decades had volunteered at an after-school program associated with the Santa Monica Police Department. An investigation revealed Mr. Uller, 50, had molested at least four boys on the city’s watch.

Allegations from dozens of others soon emerged, dating to the 1980s and 1990s. Weeks after his arrest, Mr. Uller hanged himself in his apartment on the day he was scheduled to appear in court.

Seven years later, Santa Monica is still paying for his crimes. At last count, the bill had reached nearly $230 million.

That’s how much money the city has distributed to 229 plaintiffs who said they had been sexually assaulted by Mr. Uller. More than 150 additional cases remain.

Budget reserves are now so low that last year the credit rating agency S&P Global lowered Santa Monica’s bond rating. Insurance has covered only about 10 percent of the city’s expenses. At a budget workshop in March, the City Council discussed selling a library to replenish a fund it had depleted to pay sex abuse claimants.

“I’m afraid that we’re careening toward bankruptcy,” Dan Hall, a city councilman, told his colleagues.

Los Angeles County made international headlines last month after it agreed to pay $4 billion to settle nearly 7,000 sex abuse claims brought by adults who had been children in its juvenile detention and foster care systems. The deal, recently approved by county leaders, is the largest of its kind in U.S. history.

But across California, it was one payout among many.

Cities like Santa Monica, along with counties and school districts around the state, are grappling with their own steep judgments and settlements that are not as record-breaking as Los Angeles County’s but are nonetheless pushing some of them to the brink of financial crisis. A state law signed in 2019 by Gov. Gavin Newsom expanded the number of child sexual abuse lawsuits that can be filed against public institutions. The law, known as Assembly Bill 218 or A.B. 218, has set off a wave of litigation pitting California’s ideals as a defender of the vulnerable against its cash-strapped financial realities.

Inspired by the #MeToo movement and revelations of child abuse covered up by the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts, the law lifted the age limit for filing childhood sex abuse lawsuits against employers that let such abuse happen, and opened a three-year window for claims that had expired under the old statute of limitations. Now, hundreds of lawsuits representing thousands of plaintiffs have led to scores of multimillion-dollar judgments and settlements, and even the author of the law has called for a retooling to give taxpayer-funded entities a break.

In the Southern California community of Moreno Valley, a jury verdict in 2023 left the school district with a judgment totaling $121.5 million. Though the district, which serves about 34,000 students, negotiated its payout to $45 million, its insurance costs have soared.

 

Read the full article
[NYT has a limited number of free reads]

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wow. If only someone could have foreseen this…

/sarc

What I want to know is…was the person referenced above in the Santa Monica incidents a registered person or not a registered person?

This is what happens when lawmakers are constantly striving to build a puritanical society where everyone is “offended” by the most mundane cr*p. I blame cancel, me too, and outrage culture for ALL OF IT…

Victims have become predatory opportunists in their shameless pursuit to cash in.

It’s all about easily getting “set up” for life.

There is no going back. We are already in the swamp.